There is nothing mid-level about her. She has spent over six years in a university and hundreds of clinical hours learning to become a Nurse Practitioner, not half of a physician. She spent years as a bedside nurse prior to advancing her education to become a NP. Physicians and nurses have two separate career paths in which they collaborate to care for men, women, and children.
When I first heard the term “midlevel” I wondered if the Advanced Practice Nurse (APRN) is in the middle, who is above and below? If APRNs are viewed as below physicians, does that make her above registered nurses? An APRN has advanced assessment skill and practice authority, but she is still a nurse. She always maintains her registered nurse license. An APRN does not graduate from or stop being a nurse when she becomes an advanced practice nurse!
Words mean things. Why would anyone want to go see someone for their healthcare needs that is described as “mid-level?” APRNs produce the same good outcomes as other primary care providers. Their outcomes are not mid-level, their care is not mid-level, and their experience is not mid-level.
The use of “mid-level” comes from the U.S. government. They use the terms mid-level and non-physician practitioner to describe APRNS and Physicians Assistants (PA). The APRN Consensus Model encourages the use of the term Advanced Practice Nurse (APRN) to describe Nurse Midwives, Clinical Nurse Specialists, Nurse Anesthetists, and Nurse Practitioners. With the implementation of the APRN Consensus Model, throughout the majority of the United States, the use of APRN is increasing. It is being used more in legislative language too. Despit this progress, the use of “mid-level” is still rampant. We need to encourage the use of APRN in our professional circles.
Standing together, as healthcare professionals, we can promote the good work of APRNs by using an accurate descriptor. Our patients are listening.